What overarching principle governs the relationship between accessions and their original goods?

The correct choice emphasizes that the identity of the original goods is maintained in the context of accessions. Accessions refer to goods that are physically united with other goods, such that the original goods retain their identity despite the combination. For example, if a component is added to a machine, the machine is still identifiable as the original product, even though it has been enhanced or modified.

This principle is essential in secured transactions because it helps establish the rights of secured parties when it comes to determining ownership and prioritizing claims on the collateral. The original goods serve as the foundational asset, and while accessions may enhance or modify them, they do not alter the original goods’ identification or ownership status. This understanding helps secure creditors assess their rights and the potential impact on their collateral in cases of default.

In contrast, accessions are not standalone assets; they depend on the original goods to maintain their status and legal classification. Jurisdictional differences may affect how accessions are treated but do not override the underlying rule of identity. Similarly, while it may be possible to separate accessions from the original goods under certain circumstances, this does not negate the necessity of recognizing the identity of the original goods that give rise to the accessions.